Politics
Rich's revisionist history presented to the Royal Commission
By Andrew Westerman |
18 May 2026
A critique of Dr David Rich’s testimony to the Royal Commission, arguing that Zionism is selectively framed as defensive nationalism while its colonial dimensions are minimised or obscured through historical revisionism.
By comparing the development of Zionism with the colonial trajectory of South Africa, this article argues that settler-colonial projects do not always begin with explicit genocidal intent or even overt conquest. Rather, they often emerge gradually through settlement, land acquisition, legal restructuring, and the asymmetrical exercise of power. It contends that Rich’s testimony strips away this broader historical context in order to portray anti-colonial critiques of Israel as inherently extremist, while collapsing distinctions between criticism of the Israeli state, opposition to Zionism, antisemitism, and violence against Jews.